Nigeria’s basic education system is straining under pressures that threaten to compromise the country’s demographic promise. The numbers are unflinching: millions of children excluded from school, millions more in school but not learning, an underfunded system buckling under persistent insecurity, and a teacher pipeline thinning just when national demographics demand its expansion. Yet scattered across this landscape of distress are pockets of reform that demonstrate how rapidly outcomes can improve when policy ambition, financial discipline and institutional execution align.
UNICEF’s 2024 Situation Analysis of Children in Nigeria paints the starkest picture yet. An estimated 10.2 million primary-school-age children and 8.1 million lower-secondary-age children are out of school: by far the largest out-of-school population globally. A companion UNICEF briefing adds a deeper nuance: one in four primary-school children is out of school, and three in four fail to acquire foundational literacy and numeracy even when they attend. These figures point not merely to gaps in enrolment but to the crumbling of the country’s human capital base. In a decade when Nigeria aims to transition from consumption-driven expansion to productivity-led growth, the country is effectively forfeiting the early learning years of millions of children who will constitute its labour force.
“What matters is not the optics of corporate social responsibility but the measurable return on investment in national productivity. Public-private pilots must be evaluated rigorously and scaled based on learning gains per naira spent.”
For those fortunate enough to be enrolled, the promise of meaningful learning remains tenuous. A 2024 World Bank assessment estimates that 72.6% of Nigerian children aged 7–14 cannot read and understand a simple grade-level text – a stark expression of “learning poverty”. While the deficits are steepest in the Northeast and Northwest, no geopolitical zone is insulated from the problem. Even compared with peer countries, Nigeria’s learning losses stand out for their scale and persistence. The issue is not academic alone; it is profoundly economic. A workforce unable to absorb foundational skills cannot drive innovation, raise productivity or anchor long-term competitiveness, regardless of its size.
Insecurity compounds this story of fragility. Across several northern states, school abductions, banditry, insurgency and community-level violence continue to suppress attendance and, in many cases, force parents to withdraw children altogether. The federal government’s National Plan on Financing Safe Schools (2023–2026) initially projected ₦144.8 billion in requirements over four years, a recognition that learning cannot occur where fear dominates. Yet civil society budget tracking indicates that the 2024 federal allocation fell sharply to roughly ₦5 billion, leaving a significant funding gap and raising questions about execution. No policy reform, however well designed, can achieve a system-wide impact if families remain uncertain that their children will return home safely from school.
As with most public goods, the money question sits at the centre. UNESCO’s global benchmark recommends allocating 15–20% of public expenditure – or between 4–6% of GDP – to education. Nigeria’s 2024 federal budget devoted roughly 8.2% to the sector, equivalent to about 3.3% of GDP according to BudgIT’s fiscal review. This is an improvement on certain past cycles but remains far from the global guideposts to which aspirational economies calibrate themselves. Early commentary on the 2025 federal budget suggests that the education share may hover around 7%, with the distribution across basic, post-basic and tertiary education still evolving. The constancy of the challenge is unmistakable: a nation that routinely articulates an ambition for skills-driven industrialisation continues to underinvest in the very pipeline that produces those skills.
Read also: Nigerian leaders urged to prioritise infrastructure, human capital investment
But amid the wider malaise, there are flickers of progress. UBEC reported that by the first half of 2025, ₦92.4 billion in matching grants had been accessed by 25 states and the FCT – an encouraging improvement in drawdown rates. The commission also released ₦19 billion for teacher professional development across the 2023/24 cycle. The caveat is familiar: some states do not consistently meet counterpart funding obligations or fail to fully implement approved projects. The result is a system where progress is as uneven as Nigeria’s political map, with reformist states moving forward while others remain trapped in cycles of underperformance.
Development partners have begun to take a multi-year view. In 2024, the World Bank approved a $1.57 billion financing package for Nigeria, including $500 million dedicated to governance reforms in the education and health sectors. The complementary HOPE-GOV (Nigeria Human Capital Opportunities for Prosperity and Equity) programme sets explicit targets: among them, reducing staffing gaps in basic education by 40% by 2028 and expanding the number of states accessing full UBEC allocations. For once, international financing is paired with system-strengthening incentives rather than isolated project-based interventions. Whether these reforms endure, however, depends squarely on the political will of state governments and the rigour of monitoring frameworks.
Quality signals within the system reveal their own troubling volatility. Media reports in August 2025 highlighted a dramatic decline in WAEC pass rates (five credits including English and Mathematics) for school candidates to 38.3%, down from 72.1% the previous year. Such a swing, whether due to methodological recalibration, compromised examination conditions or deeper learning deficits, is an unmistakable alarm. A system in which outcomes oscillate this sharply lacks the steady quality controls essential for credibility, tertiary readiness and workforce preparedness.
Is Nigeria in a basic education crisis? On access, on learning outcomes, and on equity, few would contest that the answer is yes. But there is another truth running parallel to this reality: improvement is not hypothetical. States that have invested consistently in teacher training, renovated classrooms, strengthened school governance and aligned political leadership with educational outcomes have seen measurable progress within a single electoral cycle. The challenge is scaling these successes from isolated examples to national norms.
This requires a strategic reorientation. Nigeria must begin treating basic education as growth capital rather than social spending. The federal budget must move deliberately toward the 15–20% benchmark, and states must match that ambition with transparent funding structures that protect basic education from political volatility. Capital expenditure – classrooms, sanitation, water, power, connectivity – must be ring-fenced, and disbursements linked to verifiable outputs. Reform cannot thrive on goodwill alone; it demands enforceable accountability.
Central to the solution is the teacher pipeline. Nigeria faces an estimated shortfall of 195,000 teachers in public primary schools. Addressing this requires an orchestrated national plan to hire and deploy educators strategically, expand teacher training institutions, reform pay structures to reward competency and leadership, and ensure that in-service training becomes the rule rather than the exception. No country has achieved long-term education gains without investing deeply in its teachers; Nigeria will not be the first to defy that pattern.
Corporate Nigeria, too, must recognise its stake. Firms cannot flourish in an economy where many of the future workers lack foundational literacy and numeracy. This is not a philanthropic challenge; it is a competitiveness challenge. The private sector can co-finance data systems that track learning outcomes in real time, contribute to teacher training – particularly in digital pedagogy – and support last-mile infrastructure such as connectivity and power that make modern teaching methods viable. What matters is not the optics of corporate social responsibility but the measurable return on investment in national productivity. Public-private pilots must be evaluated rigorously and scaled based on learning gains per naira spent.
In the final analysis, the case for urgent action is economic, not merely moral. Nigeria adds millions of young people to its labour force every year. Without foundational skills, this demographic advantage becomes a liability. Global research consistently shows that human capital accounts for a substantial share of long-term GDP growth. Countries that fail to equip their young populations with basic literacy and numeracy lose competitiveness before the race even begins.
Nigeria stands at an inflection point, and the evidence is severe but not hopeless. With disciplined investment, political clarity and strategic partnerships, today’s crisis can become tomorrow’s turning point. Basic education is not a discretionary social programme; it is the bedrock of economic infrastructure. And like all infrastructure, its dividends accrue only when nations invest early, invest boldly and sustain commitment across generations.
Dr Hani Okoroafor is a global informatics expert advising corporate boards across Europe, Africa, North America, and the Middle East. He serves on the Editorial Advisory Board of BusinessDay. Reactions are welcome at doctorhaniel@gmail.com.
